Why ‘no jab’ should not always mean ‘no job’ - Tod

  • Detail
Why ‘no jab’ should not always mean ‘no job’ - Today News Post Today News || UK News

No jab, no job? The simplicity of the slogan belies the practical and legal complexities of the concept. Some companies are already considering employment contracts requiring new and existing staff to have jabs once all adults have been offered Covid-19 vaccinationstoronto_police. But some employers’ and employees’ groups are raising alarmsThe United States, in Washington D.C., USA. January 21, 1957AFP.

The head of the US Business Round Table has warned against companies “hectoring” workers into having a jab; Britain’s Trades Union Congress calls it the “wrong approach”super spreaders. The UK’s vaccines minister has cautioned it would be discriminatory, and vaccinations should be a matter of persuasion — but said it was ultimately up to businesses.

Some broad principles can help to chart a path through this ethical jungle. One is that, just as governments have generally not made vaccinations mandatory, encouragement must wherever possible be preferable to compulsion. Second, governments and employers have a duty to make sure workplaces continue to meet Covid-secure standards. Requiring workers to be vaccinated should not shift on to them all responsibility for their own safety.

In some sectors — especially where jobs require extensive contact with third parties — the desirability of having staff vaccinated is greater than in othersreopening_plans. For healthcare and care home workers, the need is high; health staff in some settings are already encouraged or sometimes obliged to be inoculated against diseases they may be exposed to in their work. That principle might extend to teachers, police and emergency staff, retail and hospitality workersbased upon their symptoms. For employers, part of making their working environment Covid-safe is ensuring staff are protected from being infected by clients and contacts, as well as each other.

Copyright © 2011 JIN SHI